Zoom Logo

Quality Incentives Workgroup - Shared screen with speaker view
Amy Wall
16:31
Si alguien necesita interpretación en español, haga clic en el globo blanco en la parte inferior de la pantalla con la etiqueta "Interpretation." Luego haga clic en “Spanish” y seleccione "Mute original audio.”
Amy Wall
17:30
La presentación de hoy se publicará en el sitio web del DDS en: https://www.dds.ca.gov/initiative/stakeholder-events/
Amy Wall
18:24
¿Comentarios? ¿Preguntas? Mande su correo electrónico a QualityIncentives@dds.ca.gov
Mike Pereira
19:36
Good afternoon, everyone.... Happy Holidays!
Amy Wall
22:10
Comments? Questions? Email QualityIncentives@dds.ca.gov
Amy Wall
23:46
Today’s materials are posted on the DDS website at: https://www.dds.ca.gov/initiative/stakeholder-events/
Michelle Ramirez
38:33
All are great but 1st two are very important. :)
Tania Morawiec
39:13
choice, individualization, person-centered, culturally responsive, HCBS, accountability, transparency, flexibility-all key
Jacquie Dillard-Foss
39:24
All of them feel really important
Judy Mark
39:36
These are all good.
Lisa Gonzales
40:13
Consumer choices, services be culturally and linguistically responsive, HCBS along with the rest are important
Judy Mark
40:17
I totally agree. Thanks, Diva!
Michelle Ramirez
40:51
All are great... 1st two are most important and foundational.
Tania Morawiec
41:06
I think developing a framework for whole person assessment to guide services is helpful-exploring SAMHSA's 8 dimensions of wellness and the social determinants of health inform quality of service in a meaningful way
Lucina Galarza
42:06
I agree with all, but not sure how developmental center resources can be used. Are there examples of what resources are available.
Tania Morawiec
43:01
We cannot lose sight of how we collect measures-what voice is heard. Studies show provider input varies from self-report
Sascha Bittner
44:07
TRUE
Tania Morawiec
45:21
Best practice exemplified via case study can help clarify expectations in the field
Kimberly Mills
46:59
I agree with Judy. HCBS covers so many areas.
Victor Lira
48:34
Good Point - HCBS compliance is a measurable outcome.
Jacquie Dillard-Foss
53:56
Within the Providers control and not the Provider controlling the individuals choice is a very different conversation..
Judy Mark
54:40
Exactly, Jacquie!
Judy Mark
55:51
I forgot to introduce myself, sorry! Judy Mark, President of Disability Voices United and parent of a 24 year old son who is a participant in the Self-Determination Program
Sascha Bittner
56:16
everyone knows you, judy, lol
Eric Zigman
01:00:52
Me too. I forgot to introduce myself: Eric Zigman, Executive Director Golden Gate Regional Center. In relation to Jacquie and Judy's comment, a core foundational element of quality management is that "the customer defines quality" Those we serve should be defining what quality is for themselves on an individual basis, and hopefully (through some process) on a system-wide basis. It will be a challenge to scale from quality expectations and experience of hundreds of thousands of individuals who are served in our system, and formulate the systemic measures that will help us measure whether we are going in the right direction. Mary Lou may have experience and knowledge of how we do that...
Judy Mark
01:04:15
The two workgroups are very intertwined.
Tania Morawiec
01:06:05
NCI will be great to tap but it, like other data sources, is limited. NCI’s community inclusion data suggests thatindividuals are participating in a wide range ofcommunity activities, but to what extent theindividual is fully engaged in their community duringthe activity is less fully explored. So data sources, existing measures, need for evolution or expansion of those measures, and resources (funds/researchers/MOUs) for collection need to be part of the conversation.
Eric Zigman
01:06:48
Totally agree, Sascha! Quality is directly related to expectations. Some measure should be in supporting the exploration of possibilities. So individuals can choose from a "horizon" of choices" !!
Dorrie Koenig
01:11:54
Addressing the work force crisis will be critical to offering person centered supports
Alona Yorkshire
01:13:17
If we can assume that better trained staff contribute to better quality supports, we can correlate incentives with staff training such as DSP training, RBT if appropriate, and definitely PCT!
Lisa Gonzales
01:14:46
Totally agree with you Alona
Judy Mark
01:17:16
A few of these seem more like measures for a regional center rather than a service provider.
Victor Lira
01:19:01
This is a great example of how the RC measures may overlap with Service Provider Quality incentives
Victor Lira
01:19:55
We still need to be wary of measuring utilization vs. quality of services
Jacquie Dillard-Foss
01:20:12
So utilization could be a factor in determining quality measures ?
Judy Mark
01:22:38
Quality and Outcome measures should be linked because a quality service provider should be supporting a person to have good outcomes.
Mike Pereira
01:22:54
Victor- yes... and in all actuality, these are examples of type of measures that would be applicable to a general principle, and this example, though seemingly directed at Rcs (per Judy) does have contextual relation to a service provider- particularly process measures, performance, quality, and ultimately outcome measures... good service providers should be assessing these types of measures for themselves and overlay that on top of the participant's choices preferences, etc. as a means to define success for a participant in terms of quality of life
Pete Cervinka
01:25:32
whether an entity exists is the structural measure. whether a process exists is a process measure. how much of it is happening (a count of activity, or utilization of a service) is a performance measure. whether it is being done "well" is the quality measure. and it can be difficult to measure quality without also knowing the process and performance measure. and does something being done well actually make a difference?, is the outcome measure.
Tania Morawiec
01:25:34
great examples-so complex. Measures and best practices are easier when tied to evidence based practices and fidelity scales. This evaluation is more accurate with a 3rd party reviewer because self-eval of EBP implementation is challenging-especially when the provider does not have proper TA to understand, design and support implementation. This is a resource issue
Tania Morawiec
01:27:13
Does the field have the resources they need? HCBS implementation success often involves decentralization and resources for community based teams-tech, etc... provider transformation is a part of this so do we incentivize that?
Mike Pereira
01:28:53
Ultimately, as Victor and others have mentioned, the CAPACITY for Data Collection, as well as the versatility of using the raw data will be critical. As everyone agreed, having 150 measures is untenable- so would having 150 data points. How data is aggregated and synthesized can glean notable information- especially in the areas of service disparities as well as the difference between utilization and choice driven satisfaction with services.
Tania Morawiec
01:31:01
EX-DSP training in implicit bias is essential and helpful but what other markers do we need to support individualization of services and person centered planning? Trauma informed care and motivational interviewing skills can be very helpful when engaging and supporting people who have disabilities in a meaningful way.
Eric Zigman
01:34:23
Thanks everyone. I have to jump into another meeting. Good discussion.
carolyn tellalian
01:34:29
As for processes, in the central valley we have not had "trained" employment support staff employed by the vendors so getting to a permanent job position is not successful. There needs to be certain training expected at the vendor level.
Lucina Galarza
01:37:06
Or when referring to employment consider naming it as "employment focused " so you can include volunteer positions or job training.
Tania Morawiec
01:39:36
best practice in knowledge translation when sharing info with the community is essential
Pablo Velez
01:51:36
HI All: We are very concerned that we are talking about the incentive program that is going to be just the 10% variable portion. I think we have a serious STRUCTURAL problem that is being able to hire and retain staff in California. The cost of living is no longer attractive or sustainable and the payments we can provide to meet the needs of the consumers as we reopen after the pandemic. I think we have a serious program and we have an urgency.
Jacquie Dillard-Foss
01:52:22
As long as it does not lead to how we do not meet the needs of the consumer, there will always a balance that we must be cognizant of that we can not create a list of reason why we have not met the measure but we have a list on how to meet the measure. At the end of the day we must remain vigilant on person centered supports and making sure we do not have this be a provider centric conversation.
Tania Morawiec
01:54:53
`Be well, thank you.